Tue, 23 Sep 2025, 11:12 am

7 March, the Day Bangladesh Was Conceived

BD Daily Online Desk:
  • Update Time : Thursday, March 7, 2024
  • 86 Time View

7 March 1971 is a date that is indelibly etched in the hearts and minds of Bengalis worldwide with due pride and justification. And if not, it ought to be. Momentarily forget Padma Bridge, the Metro, and suchlike. As great as they are, they are pale achievements in comparison (no disrespect intended to Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina). It was on this Allah-blessed, sun-kissed day that work began on the greatest construction EVER known in the history of the region.

There was not a bulldozer, crane, single yellow-jacketed person wearing a hard-hat, or heavy earth moving equipment in sight. Nor were there any earth shattering, ear-shattering jackhammers that make your ears recoil and beg for mercy. This was no ordinary everyday foundation stone laying ceremony and those present – all two million of them – no doubt felt that.

The architect, a handsome, well known, very talented, much loved and greatly admired politician named Sheikh Mujibur Rahman originally from Tungipara, had no previous experience of designing nor building such a colossal structure – there had not been any need. But as if guided by divinity in a dream, he went ahead anyway. Dr. Martin Luther King knew what that was like.

Great injustice

7 March, the Day Bangladesh Was ConceivedThe great concept of 1971 was never part of his career plans and there wasn’t a blue print in existence for reference. If the people with whom he had aligned his unique political talents had behaved honourably and justly, the work would never have even begun and not even a single blade of grass trod upon.

Sheikh Mujib went to Ramna Racecourse (now Suhrawardy Udyan) in Dhaka as a political leader to update and inform his admirers-cum-voters about his political thoughts. Initiated as a regular political rally, it quickly developed into becoming something more spectacular, a war cry for emancipation from the oppression of West Pakistan, which shackled liberty.

Countless millions had made it clear they had wanted the vibrant Tungiparian to lead them.

They had left their humble homes with hope in their hearts for a better future and stood in long queues for hours, in sweltering heat, without water or overhead covering, at makeshift polling stations to register their endorsement of their belief in him. They say ‘every cloud has a silver lining’ and ‘in every tear there is a rainbow’. Those adages certainly rang true for inspiring Mujib. When Sheikh Mujibur was rejected so, too, were the countless millions of people who had voted for him.

On 7 March 1971, he voiced his disappointment and grievances to the people in no uncertain terms and held back no punches in the delivery. He outlined the injustice that had occurred, the enormous project that lay ahead, and asked the people – his people… his devout followers – for their support. Although knowing it was not going to be a Disneyland ride of fun, and thrills, and many would encounter great danger and even death, they willingly pledged support.

Words are singularly the most powerful force available to humanity. They’re alive with energy, power, and the ability to encourage and inspire beyond individual expectations.

Bangabandhu’s speech is evidence of their immeasurable potency. Upon completion of the rousing, inspirational speech the seeds of a new nation were sown. That single moving speech changed history in the region and triggered the birth of a nation… the birth of Bangladesh, with Bangabandhu duly recognised as both its Father and Architect.

Unique speeches

Only four political speeches I know have ever touched the hearts and souls of generations and ascended into immortality.  Those are Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address (November 19, 1863), Martin Luther King’s ‘I Had a Dream’ (August, 28 1963), John F. Kennedy’s inaugural speech ‘Ask Not What Your Country Can Do For You’ (January 20, 1961), and Sheikh Mujibur Rahman’s momentous speech ‘Birth of a Nation’ (March 7, 1971).

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) gave recognition to the epoch-making speech on October 30, 2017. Why it took 46 years for UNESCO to recognize the brilliant speech really boggles the mind. I attempted to bring it to the attention of UNESCO in early 2002 without success, and no doubt I was not alone beating the drum.

But, I am proud to say (interpret as ‘boast’ if you wish!) to have recognized its fine rare qualities and historic significance in 2000, and to capture it for the first time ever in a tribute poster. It has now found its place at Awami League Headquarter, Bangabandhu Museum, and some European royal houses. It is seen in some quarters to be the unofficial Proclamation of Independence of Bangladesh. I feel that it should be hung in every school and regarded as a thing of admiration and pride.

7 March is indeed a day for all Bengalis to take pride in and celebrate. It would be a grave injustice, however, if honour, respect, and gratitude were not extended to all freedom fighters – both living and dead. Their past has given us our present.

Joi Bangla!

___________________________

The writer is a human rights activist and honorary member of Bangladesh Freedom Fighters Association

Please Share This Post in Your Social Media

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More News Of This Category

The megastar plays a philosophy professor shaken by a student’s sexual assault allegation against a colleague in Luca Guadagnino’s new film – and she’s easily the best thing about it. Julia Roberts doesn’t make many films these days. She was in Leave the World Behind in 2023; in 2022, there was her tropical romantic comedy with George Clooney, Ticket to Paradise; and then we have to jump all the way back to 2018 for her previous turn in Ben Is Back. But you can see why she chose to star in After the Hunt, a contentious campus drama directed by Luca Guadagnino (Call Me By Your Name, Challengers). Roberts is on screen for almost every one of its 139 minutes, and she is the monumental centre around which its chaos and controversy swirl. It’s the kind of heavyweight role that gets awards nominations if it goes to the right person – and Roberts is definitely the right person. Her character is Alma, a philosophy professor at Yale University. Striding regally around its leafy quadrangles in a chic white suit that matches her blonde hair, this combatively intelligent alpha female is adored by everyone who knows her. Her husband Frederik (Michael Stuhlbarg) is resigned to the fact that he loves her more than she loves him, and is willing to make whimsical jokes about the imbalance; Hank (Andrew Garfield), a would-be rebellious friend and colleague, is even more flirtatious with her than he is with everyone else; and her favourite PhD student, Maggie (Ayo Edebiri), worships her – which could explain why she is Alma’s favourite PhD student. It seems as if the status quo might soon be upset, though, as either Alma or Hank – or perhaps both – is expected to be granted permanent tenure. But then something far more drastic happens. The day after a boozy party in Alma and Frederik’s book-lined flat, Maggie tells Alma that Hank walked her home and then “crossed a line”. Alma is sympathetic – but only up to a point. There is no evidence of assault, so she isn’t sure whether to trust the word of a new friend over an old one, especially at such a critical moment in her career. And maybe, her thinking goes, lines were crossed at the party anyway, considering that teachers and students were hugging each other while knocking back expensive wine. “Roberts’ Alma is a coiled spring: her steely stillness makes her ferocity all the more powerful” It’s refreshing to see a grown-up Hollywood film that takes on contemporary issues: feminism, cancel culture, identity politics, and the generation gap. But After the Hunt is more of an admirable project than an engaging drama, because it never stops reminding you of how clever it wants to be. Guadagnino keeps showing off his quirky camera angles and intrusive music choices. The screenplay, by Nora Garrett, squeezes too much philosophical jargon into the dialogue, and too many tangential scenes and subplots into the structure. You might think that the alleged assault would be a big enough deal for any film, but Alma is given mysterious abdominal pains and guilty secrets, and Maggie is overloaded with significance as a queer, black, plagiarism-prone young woman with a non-binary partner and rich parents who are major donors to the university. In theory, viewers of After the Hunt should leave the cinema arguing about its subject matter. In practice, they’re more likely to be asking each other what was going on and what it meant. It’s all a bit much, basically. Garfield, miscast as a denim-clad dude who is, it is implied, roughly the same age as Roberts’ character, shouts and swears and waves his arms with a quantity-over-quality approach to acting. Stuhlbarg’s flouncing and sing-song delivery are presumably meant to be irritating, but perhaps not as irritating as they actually are. At the heart of it all, though, Roberts is a different matter. She understands that less can be more. Her Alma is a coiled spring: her steely stillness makes her ferocity all the more powerful and her pain all the more intense. Her muttering is scarier than Garfield’s yelling, and when she glares at someone, they stay glared at. It’s an expertly controlled performance which demonstrates why Roberts has been a Hollywood icon for so long, and why she could well be in line for her second Oscar, 25 years after Erin Brockovich. After the Hunt would have been better if everyone else involved had had some of that control, too.

© All rights reserved © 2019 WeeklyBangladeshNY.Net
Theme Dwonload From ThemesBazar.Com