Tue, 23 Sep 2025, 05:40 am

Lack of medicine advertising: Consumers trapped in deceptive practices

BD Daily Online Desk:
  • Update Time : Wednesday, December 11, 2024
  • 87 Time View
Pharmaceutical companies in Bangladesh are spending approximately Tk6,000 crore annually on activities associated with medicine promotion, including payments to doctors and medical representatives. Despite this, there is no advertising focused on the quality or effectiveness of medicines. This lack of awareness leaves consumers in the dark, often falling victim to deceptive practices without any recourse. Patients are entirely dependent on doctors, who are influenced by pharmaceutical companies, leading to potentially harmful prescribing habits.

Many patients, relying on old prescriptions, face risks by consuming medicines without updated medical advice. Meanwhile, pharmaceutical companies use unethical means to manipulate the market by offering incentives such as refrigerators, TVs, cars, flats, overseas trips, and cash to doctors. Experts stress the urgent need for public awareness campaigns about the quality and effectiveness of medicines so that consumers can make informed decisions rather than blindly relying on doctors influenced by corporate interests.

Role of Doctors and Pharmaceutical Companies

Doctors, lacking adequate monitoring, often prescribe unnecessary medications to bolster pharmaceutical company profits and increase their personal earnings. While this benefits companies and some doctors, it compromises the health of millions. Despite laws restricting medicine advertising under the Directorate General of Drug Administration (DGDA), these regulations often remain ineffective in addressing unethical practices.

Former Chairman of the Department of Pharmacy at the University of Dhaka, Professor ABM Faruk, highlights that pharmaceutical companies frequently target senior doctors with extravagant gifts, setting a precedent followed by junior doctors. These doctors, influenced by incentives, prescribe medicines from specific companies regardless of necessity. Medical representatives monitor prescriptions and report back to their superiors, ensuring compliance.

“Patients blindly trust prescriptions without knowing about the medicine’s effectiveness. Basic awareness can help avoid this unnecessary reliance,” Faruk noted.

Dirty Marketing Practices

A recent report by the Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS) revealed that over 29% of pharmaceutical companies’ turnover is spent on marketing activities. The country’s medicine market has already surpassed Tk20,500 crore, with more than Tk6,000 crore allocated solely for marketing, primarily through unethical practices targeting doctors.

As a result, an entire professional class of medical representatives has emerged. These representatives influence doctors, persuading them to prescribe their company’s medicines, often with little regard for the medicine’s actual efficacy.

Impact on Public Health

Experts warn that such unethical practices not only raise the cost of medicines but also allow less effective and more harmful drugs to infiltrate the market. The absence of clinical trials and rigorous testing exacerbates the issue, with potentially dangerous medicines receiving approval without proper evaluation.

Professor Faruk states, “The influence of pharmaceutical companies is so strong that medicines often gain approval without adequate scrutiny. The primary goal of these companies is profit, not public health.”

Dr. Syed Abdul Hamid, Professor at the Institute of Health Economics, University of Dhaka, stresses the need for stricter oversight of doctors. “Doctors must be held accountable for their earnings and prescribing practices. The current system encourages unethical behaviour, raising medicine prices and exposing patients to ineffective or harmful drugs.”

Experts Call for Reform  

Specialists advocate for transparent advertising of medicines, including their quality and efficacy, through the media. Such measures would empower consumers to make informed decisions based on their own judgment. In addition, authorities must address the lack of skilled personnel at the DGDA, as this deficiency poses significant risks to public health.

Experts also emphasise the need for stringent monitoring to curb unethical practices in the pharmaceutical sector. “Manipulation of public health for profit must stop. Transparent promotion of medicines is essential to ensure patient safety and informed consumption,” Faruk concluded.

While Bangladesh’s pharmaceutical sector has gained global recognition, its internal marketing and regulatory practices require significant reform. Without such changes, the lives and health of millions will remain at risk due to deceptive and unethical practices by pharmaceutical companies.

Please Share This Post in Your Social Media

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More News Of This Category

The megastar plays a philosophy professor shaken by a student’s sexual assault allegation against a colleague in Luca Guadagnino’s new film – and she’s easily the best thing about it. Julia Roberts doesn’t make many films these days. She was in Leave the World Behind in 2023; in 2022, there was her tropical romantic comedy with George Clooney, Ticket to Paradise; and then we have to jump all the way back to 2018 for her previous turn in Ben Is Back. But you can see why she chose to star in After the Hunt, a contentious campus drama directed by Luca Guadagnino (Call Me By Your Name, Challengers). Roberts is on screen for almost every one of its 139 minutes, and she is the monumental centre around which its chaos and controversy swirl. It’s the kind of heavyweight role that gets awards nominations if it goes to the right person – and Roberts is definitely the right person. Her character is Alma, a philosophy professor at Yale University. Striding regally around its leafy quadrangles in a chic white suit that matches her blonde hair, this combatively intelligent alpha female is adored by everyone who knows her. Her husband Frederik (Michael Stuhlbarg) is resigned to the fact that he loves her more than she loves him, and is willing to make whimsical jokes about the imbalance; Hank (Andrew Garfield), a would-be rebellious friend and colleague, is even more flirtatious with her than he is with everyone else; and her favourite PhD student, Maggie (Ayo Edebiri), worships her – which could explain why she is Alma’s favourite PhD student. It seems as if the status quo might soon be upset, though, as either Alma or Hank – or perhaps both – is expected to be granted permanent tenure. But then something far more drastic happens. The day after a boozy party in Alma and Frederik’s book-lined flat, Maggie tells Alma that Hank walked her home and then “crossed a line”. Alma is sympathetic – but only up to a point. There is no evidence of assault, so she isn’t sure whether to trust the word of a new friend over an old one, especially at such a critical moment in her career. And maybe, her thinking goes, lines were crossed at the party anyway, considering that teachers and students were hugging each other while knocking back expensive wine. “Roberts’ Alma is a coiled spring: her steely stillness makes her ferocity all the more powerful” It’s refreshing to see a grown-up Hollywood film that takes on contemporary issues: feminism, cancel culture, identity politics, and the generation gap. But After the Hunt is more of an admirable project than an engaging drama, because it never stops reminding you of how clever it wants to be. Guadagnino keeps showing off his quirky camera angles and intrusive music choices. The screenplay, by Nora Garrett, squeezes too much philosophical jargon into the dialogue, and too many tangential scenes and subplots into the structure. You might think that the alleged assault would be a big enough deal for any film, but Alma is given mysterious abdominal pains and guilty secrets, and Maggie is overloaded with significance as a queer, black, plagiarism-prone young woman with a non-binary partner and rich parents who are major donors to the university. In theory, viewers of After the Hunt should leave the cinema arguing about its subject matter. In practice, they’re more likely to be asking each other what was going on and what it meant. It’s all a bit much, basically. Garfield, miscast as a denim-clad dude who is, it is implied, roughly the same age as Roberts’ character, shouts and swears and waves his arms with a quantity-over-quality approach to acting. Stuhlbarg’s flouncing and sing-song delivery are presumably meant to be irritating, but perhaps not as irritating as they actually are. At the heart of it all, though, Roberts is a different matter. She understands that less can be more. Her Alma is a coiled spring: her steely stillness makes her ferocity all the more powerful and her pain all the more intense. Her muttering is scarier than Garfield’s yelling, and when she glares at someone, they stay glared at. It’s an expertly controlled performance which demonstrates why Roberts has been a Hollywood icon for so long, and why she could well be in line for her second Oscar, 25 years after Erin Brockovich. After the Hunt would have been better if everyone else involved had had some of that control, too.

© All rights reserved © 2019 WeeklyBangladeshNY.Net
Theme Dwonload From ThemesBazar.Com